AI Contract Review
Review a commercial agreement for important terms, obligations, findings, missing protections, negotiation points, and questions to raise.
Klause Review entry points
Choose an AI contract review, NDA checker, employment contract review, vendor agreement review, or legal risk assessment route. Every route uses the same structured Review Report; the names change the document context, not the quality standard.
Available now
Each option opens the main Review experience with an appropriate document context selected. The report format remains consistent: summary, prioritized findings, evidence, obligations, key facts, missing protections, negotiation suggestions, and questions.
Review a commercial agreement for important terms, obligations, findings, missing protections, negotiation points, and questions to raise.
Review confidentiality scope, exclusions, permitted disclosures, duration, remedies, and practical restrictions before signing.
Run an automated NDA review that prioritizes confidentiality clauses, obligations, exclusions, duration, remedies, and restrictions that deserve closer attention.
Review the supplied NIL agreement as a contract, including payment, rights, deliverables, restrictions, termination, and ownership language.
Review technology and service terms for scope, service levels, payment, data handling, intellectual property, liability, and exit conditions.
Review supplied privacy, data-processing, or compliance text for obligations, missing protections, unclear language, and questions to investigate.
Review the vendor-agreement portion of a due diligence process, including scope, payment, data handling, ownership, service obligations, liability, renewal, and termination.
Use a document-grounded legal risk assessment to prioritize legal and operational findings by severity, with evidence, obligations, missing protections, and practical mitigation questions.
Use the canonical Review Report to inspect a supplied document for important risks, obligations, key facts, gaps, and next questions.
Review correspondence, proposed terms, or dispute documents to separate stated facts, demands, obligations, deadlines, and unresolved questions.
Review supplied legal or policy text for unsupported assumptions, ambiguity, internal inconsistency, obligations, and passages needing verification.
Review supplied statutory, regulatory, or policy text for structure, duties, conditions, exceptions, definitions, and open questions.
Not presented as working tools
The original prototype listed generators, court-document drafting, incident response, multi-document comparison, and scenario simulation. Those workflows do not match the current Review engine, so they have been removed from the active product surface rather than being left partially functional.
Klause does not currently generate court pleadings or jurisdiction-specific recovery filings. A demand letter can still be reviewed as an informational document.
View statusThe current Review engine does not generate a complete DPIA or determine whether a statutory DPIA is legally sufficient.
View statusTime-sensitive breach classification and notification decisions require verified facts and qualified privacy counsel. The automated response workflow is not currently available.
View statusKlause can review supplied notice text, but it does not currently generate or certify a complete GDPR privacy notice.
View statusA compliant cookie policy depends on the site's actual technologies, consent configuration, vendors, and applicable law. Automated generation is not currently available.
View statusKlause can review supplied privacy-policy text, but it does not currently generate or certify a complete privacy policy.
View statusThe current product can review supplied policy text but does not generate or certify a jurisdiction-specific whistleblower program.
View statusKlause does not currently draft court submissions or provide French procedural advice. Supplied correspondence can be reviewed informationally.
View statusTermination documents are highly fact- and jurisdiction-dependent. Automated drafting is not currently available.
View statusKlause does not currently draft corporate pleadings or determine procedural eligibility under French company law.
View statusKlause does not currently predict legal outcomes or simulate litigation results. Supplied documents can still be reviewed.
View statusThe current product does not yet combine matter context into a meeting-briefing workflow.
View statusThe current Review flow processes one document at a time. Cross-document comparison is not yet available.
View statusKlause does not currently generate reusable legal templates. A received letter or proposed response can be reviewed informationally.
View statusUse the general Review route when the document does not fit one of the named entry points.
Start a general Review